![]() ![]() ![]() If this keeps happening, please file a support ticket with the below ID. I will continue my tests and welcome any feedback. Something went wrong We've logged this error and will review it as soon as we can. I really like the Duplicati GUI and there is no GUI for Duplicacy on Linux however, I find the performance difference significant. (Your performance is likely much faster.) To be 100% clear, I am running this on a small single board computer running Ubuntu dedicated to this purpose, and so compute power, memory and bandwidth are limited. In short Duplicacy seems much faster although Duplicati is storing about 200MB less data. Here is the results from a test uploading 3GB of actual data with both solutions.ĭuplicati: Upload time 1 hour, 9 minutes. These differences make the two products hard to compare. Duplicacy by default relies on file size/time stamp differencing unless you specify the “-hash” tag which is not the default while Duplicati chops files into much smaller pieces for more efficient data reduction. With just a few clicks, you can effortlessly set up backup, copy, check, and prune jobs that will reliably protect your data while making the most efficient use of your storage space. One big difference is speed/deduplication. Duplicacy comes with a newly designed web-based GUI that is not only artistically appealing but also functionally powerful. This meant i set the 3 folders up as 3 different backups. but over the last few days i've had to split out one of the sources to 3 seperate ones. I have been testing both with Backblaze B2 and am still trying to sort out which I will adopt. A MASSIVE thumbs up for Duplicacy I've been running duplicacy for a while now. X=has feature, *=has feature sort of, ?=MIGHT have feature Backup destination support comparison Supports multiple destinations (*DT requires a bakup set for each destination, but multiple sets can all have the same source files)Ĭoncurrent backup (Multiple clients can back up to the same storage at the same time)īackup summary reports (*DT not built in, possible with dupReport) Supports multiple retention polcicies (DT seems ‘better’, closer to CrashPlan type options) Supports service/daemon network share authentication (DT seems to handle it better) Windows VSS shado copies supported (DT seems to have better support) Linux LVM snapshots supported (DT seems to have better support) Lock-free deduplication (DC uses destination files names instead of a local database resulting in lower local storage needs)Ĭross-source de-duplication (possible with DC thanks to lock-free deduplication) Source code available (*DC source code for CLI only) Free (*DC command line free for individual users, else per user or computer fee) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |